Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Friday, February 16, 2018

Elvis Out Of Fatigues, Does Fatiguing Movie


G.I. Blues (1960) Has Edges Polished Off Presley

The Pelvis in uniform, being comeback error if we're to regard Elvis as iconoclast or rebel figure, which he'd been to varying degree in a first four before his country called. To tame the beast was Hal Wallis' aim. Presley needed to be industrialized, a consumer good minus potholes that controversy or poor press might impose. His knowing fans would protest (the Beatles maintained Elvis was essentially through after his service hitch), but how much of this singer's public caught merchandising drift? Wallis was experienced, perhaps cynical enough, to know fads could be sustained but for so long. If Presley was to last, it would have to be in safe vehicles recycled on two-or-so a year basis like contract stars Wallis herded at Warners and for his independent set-up with Paramount, for which distribution all his Elvis output was made. 

Et, Tu, Caricaturist? Squares In Selling Maintain Bungle Of The Pic

Just as other rock and roll acts were corporate neutralized, so would be Presley. His having served made the rebel pose unsustainable. An Elvis mustered out of uniform might wonder if this was moment to try wings at straight performing along action lines, perhaps a combat story as was engaged by other up-and-comers, or a western (picture him as one of The Magnificent Seven). But wait, the music element had to be served, this more lucrative in long runs than films that came and went. For Presley of the 60's, a film, any film, was there largely to sell records.  G.I. Blues is post-Army Presley formula in vitro, an awkward start. Weren't Elvis pics supposed to be just about Elvis? G.I. Blues has its star share focus with "pals" in his unit, two principally, each so dull as to evaporate off the screen. One romances the roommate of Presley's love interest (Juliet Prowse), to which '60 youth must have chanted "Who Cares?" The other has sired an illigit kid with a German townie (!), a plot element both soft-peddled (post-production edits?) and of no use toward making G.I.'s 104 minutes easier to withstand.




Here too, was where soundtrack marketing took center, RCA's LP pushed in both ads and the trailer. Trouble was the songs. They weren't much good, not a meaningful hit in the lot, nor a patch on singles Elvis had been getting out before, during, and after, his Army stay. G.I. Blues takes place in Germany, though all of Presley footage was done on Para's backlot. What scenics there were came of a second unit Wallis sent over, then projected behind Elvis and others doubled in the German shots. The singer's filmgoer base had been teenaged --- now it seemed Wallis was throwing nets over children, a puppet act Elvis shares being painful barometer. This, and interminable business with a crying infant, was what disillusioned fans held up as proof that Presley had been gelded. They were right as to that and more, but Wallis was vindicated by grosses, the best he'd seen so far for an association with Presley. G.I. Blues brought $3.8 million in domestic rentals, a gain on $2.7 million King Creole had earned, and $3.3 million Loving You took. This, of course, was all Wallis needed to prove he'd been right, and so dye was cast (if a Technicolor one) for future Elvis output.

5 Comments:

Blogger Michael said...

It's a pity they didn't let him act once in a while, the way modern action stars make a point of putting on glasses and a goatee to play some bookish sort in an indie drama every 10th film or so, to maintain acting cred. The Elvis movies sold but in the end, when they were dead, they were deader than Julie Andrews' career in big budget musicals. Elvis had to go back to black leather and Vegas to revive his rock and roll career before The Trouble With Girls and Change of Habit sucked it down into their black hole.

12:06 PM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Elvis was marketed to the generation that like him had been wild in its youth but now had to settle into life's routines. Being a bad boy got attention. Becoming a good boy kept the audience paying attention. Many is the star who began their career as a bad boy or girl but swiftly began playing paragons.

1:57 PM  
Blogger Kevin K. said...

I read that Col. Parker and Hal Wallis decided that Elvis fans would watch him in anything, so it made more sense financially to skimp on the scripts, songs and costars in a exchange for bigger profit.

10:24 PM  
Blogger Sean D. said...

I'm sure Elvis would have loved to go back to Europe as a civilian. Live shows during breaks in filming would've made a mint. But Col. Parker's status immigration meaning he'd not be able to re-enter the States pretty much confined Elvis to the U.S. for touring and filming of "soundstage travelogues" like Double Trouble.

10:45 AM  
Blogger William Lund said...

It's apparent from watching his serious films of the 60s ("Flaming Star" and "Wild in Country") that his raw ambition to become a film actor ("Jailhouse Rock" and "King Creole") had been diminished and he was content to say his lines, sing some songs, and collect a big pay check. As the 60s dragged on the films got worse and worse till even Hal Wallis dropped him in 1967. There was a brief bright return to live preforming in 1968-72 (which I had the privilege of seeing him in person), but then he took the John Gilbert/Wallace Reid path of self destruction. A great talent who lost his way.

12:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024